Philosopher john searle goes through the chinese room argument to prove that no matter how powerful computers are they aren t minds.
Chinese room argument summary.
The chinese room argument aims to refute a certain conception of the role of computation in human cognition.
In order to understand the argument it is necessary to see the distinction between strong and weak versions of artificial intelligence.
Gardiner addresses the chinese room argument in his book the mind s new science 1985 171 177.
The chinese room argument is a refutation of strong artificial intelligence strong ai the view that an appropriately programmed digital computer capable of passing the turing test would thereby have mental states and a mind in the same sense in which human beings have mental states and a mind.
According to strong artificial intelligence any system that implements the right computer program with the right inputs and outputs thereby has.
He calls his argument the chinese room argument note.
Gardiner considers all the standard replies to the chinese room argument and concludes that searle is correct about the room.
Searle actually believes that his argument works against non classical computers as well but it is best to start with the digital computers with which we are all most familiar the chinese room.
There is a room.
The chinese room argument by john searle is one of the most important thought experiments in 20th century philosophy of mind.
The chinese room argument is a thought experiment of john searle 1980a and associated 1984 derivation.
The point of the argument is to refute the idea that computers now or in the future can literally think.
The paper referred to a thought experiment which argued against the possibility that computers can ever have artificial intelligence ai.
Discuss the chinese room argument.
Searle asks you to imagine the following scenario.
In short executing an algorithm cannot be sufficient for thinking.
It is one of the best known and widely credited counters to claims of artificial intelligence ai that is to claims that computers do or at least can someday might think.
However several concepts developed by computer scientists are essential to understanding the argument including symbol processing turing machines.
The chinese room argument is primarily an argument in the philosophy of mind and both major computer scientists and artificial intelligence researchers consider it irrelevant to their fields.
In essence a condemnation that machines will ever be.
According to searle s original presentation the argument is based on two key claims.
